Internet Censorship Course / Book Workshop
In this activity, we will engage in a debate about the advantages and disadvantages of zero-rating.
Zero rating is a practice in which Internet service providers (ISPs) exempt certain applications or services from customers’ data usage limits, effectively making them free to use. Proponents of zero rating argue that it can increase access to information and services for low-income individuals, while opponents argue that it creates an uneven playing field by giving preferential treatment to some services over others.
Resolution. Resolved: Zero rating is a harmful practice that undermines fair competition on the internet.
Debate Teams. Divide into two teams: the affirmative team (in favor of the resolution) and the negative team (opposing the resolution). Each team should have equal numbers of members.
Opening Statements. Each team should present an opening statement of up to five minutes, during which they will introduce their arguments and provide an overview of their position.
Cross-Examination. After the opening statements, each team should cross-examine the opposing team’s opening statements. This will involve asking questions and challenging the opposing team’s arguments.
Main Arguments. Each team should present their main arguments in support of or against the resolution. The affirmative team should argue that zero rating harms consumers and innovation by allowing ISPs to pick winners and losers in the marketplace, while the negative team should argue that zero rating benefits consumers and innovation by increasing access to information and services for low-income individuals.
Rebuttal. After the main arguments have been presented, each team should rebut the opposing team’s arguments. This will involve challenging the opposing team’s claims and providing counterarguments.
Closing Statements. Finally, each team should present a closing statement of up to two minutes, during which they will summarize their position and reiterate their main arguments.