Security, Privacy, and Consumer Protection
Format
The debate will be “Oxford Style” and follow this format:
The debate is worth 35% of your course grade. You are graded on the quality of your contribution — not on which side “wins” the poll. You may be assigned the harder position, and arguing a difficult side well earns full marks.
| Component | Points | What earns full marks |
|---|---|---|
| Preparation & research | 25 | Prepared remarks show real research; arguments are grounded in evidence, cases, and the assigned readings — not just opinion. |
| Argument quality & structure | 25 | Clear thesis; logically organized points; anticipates and addresses the strongest counterarguments. |
| Rebuttal & responsiveness | 20 | Directly engages the other team’s points and audience questions, rather than repeating prepared talking points. |
| Use of evidence | 15 | Specific, accurate facts and precedents; clearly distinguishes evidence from assertion. |
| Delivery & engagement | 10 | Clear, persuasive, and professional; shares speaking time with teammates. |
| Teamwork & participation | 5 | Coordinates with teammates; contributes during the audience-question period. |
The opening and closing polls are part of the format, not the grade — they exist to make the discussion lively, not to reward the “winning” side.